Bahasa Inggris
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Digitalization in the education sector, particularly through e-government, is key to enhancing service effectiveness and efficiency in academic information systems. However, the application of this technology often faces challenges in terms of student acceptance, as it is the primary user. Using the Unified Theory of adoption and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the E-Government Adoption approach, this study endeavors to explore the determinants affecting the adoption and utilization of the Academic Information System at Tidar University. The variables studied include performance expectations, convenience expectations, social influence, supporting conditions, security and privacy risks, and trust in government. This study used quantitative methods and involved 247 active students of the State Administration Study Program as respondents. Questionnaires were utilized for data collection in this research, and the responses were examined using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with a Partial Least Squares (PLS) method. The analysis showed that the utilization of the system was substantially influenced by variables including performance expectancy, social influence, trust in governmental institutions, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention. Meanwhile, effort expectancy, perceived risk, and security risk have no significant effect. These results verify that the optimal utilization of academic information systems on campus is significantly influenced by performance expectation, social influence, and trust in government
Rincian Artikel
Referensi
[2] A. Androniceanu and I. Georgescu, “Public Administration Digitalization and Government Effectiveness in the EU Countries,” Cent. Eur. Public Adm. Rev., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2023, doi: 10.17573/cepar.2023.1.01.
[3] R. A. Kambau, “PROSES TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI DI INDONESIA,” vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 126–136, 2024.
[4] H. Q. I. Hakim, S. S. Bilqis, R. Ramadhani, and R. Vindua, “TINJAUAN LITERATUR : EFEKTIVITAS SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK,” vol. 6, pp. 74–86, 2025.
[5] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW,” vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.
[6] M. D. P. Kusuma and U. Pribadi, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Niat Perilaku Pengguna Aplikasi ‘Jogja Istimewa’ Melalui Model Umega,” Moderat J. Ilm. Ilmu Pemerintah., vol. 6, no. November, pp. 771–791, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat/article/view/4031
[7] P. Chatzoglou, D. Chatzoudes, and S. Symeonidis, “Factors affecting the intention to use e-Government services,” Proc. 2015 Fed. Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. FedCSIS 2015, no. August 2017, pp. 1489–1498, 2015, doi: 10.15439/2015F171.
[8] N. F. Amin, S. Garancang, and K. Abunawas, “KONSEP UMUM POPULASI DAN SAMPEL DALAM PENELITIAN,” J. PILAR J. Kaji. Islam Kontemporer, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–31, 2023, doi: 10.21070/2017/978-979-3401-73-7.
[9] D. Budiastuti and A. Bandur, Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media, 2018.
[10] J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V. G. Kuppelwieser, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling ( PLS-SEM ) An emerging tool in business research,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 26, pp. 106–121, 2014, doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
[11] I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 26, Edisi 10. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2024.
[12] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
[13] S. Yamin and H. Kurniawan, Generasi Baru Mengolah Data Penelitian dengan Partial Least Square Path Modeling: Aplikasi dengan Software XLSTAT, SmartPLS, dan Visual PLS. Penerbit Salemba, 2011.
[14] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” pp. 115–135, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
[15] P. N. Sharma, G. Shmueli, M. Sarstedt, N. Danks, and S. Ray, “Prediction-Oriented Model Selection in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling,” Decis. Sci., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 567–607, 2018, doi: 10.1111/deci.12329.
[16] J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
[17] Q. A. Lumintang, D. Rahmawati, P. Daffa, N. Rizka, and A. Wulansari, “ANALISIS FAKTOR PENERIMAAN PENGGUNA SIAMIK,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 115–128, 2023, doi: 10.46576/djtechno.
[18] P. N. Ardiyani et al., “Analisis Penerimaan Learning Management System Menggunakan Model UTAUT 2 Pada Universitas Tadulako,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 157–171, 2023.
[19] L. Meida and K. Trifiyanto, “Pengaruh Perceived Trust dan Perceived Risk Terhadap Behavioral Intention dengan Perceived Ease of Use sebagai Variabel Intervening,” vol. 4, no. April, pp. 217–232, 2022.
[20] N. Nazirwan, N. M. Halim, and R. Fadhil, “PERAN TRUST , PERCEIVED USEFULNESS , PERCEIVED EASE OF USE , PERCEIVED E-SERVICE QUALITY , DAN PERCEIVED RISK TERHADAP BEHAVIOR INTENTION : SUATU PENELITIAN PADA KIOSK TYME DIGITAL INFLUENCE OF TRUST , PERCEIVED USEFULNESS , PERCEIVED EASE OF USE , PERCEI,” vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 235–245, 2020.
[21] T. Handayani and Sudiana, “Analisis Penerapan Model UTAUT Terhadap Perilaku Pengguna Sistem Informasi (Studi Kasus: Sistem Informasi Akademik Pada Sttnas Yogyakarta),” Angkasa J. Ilm. Bid. Teknol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 2015.
[22] M. D. Kiswanto and D. Syamsuar, “Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan Integrasi UTAUT ( Unified Theory Of Acceptance Use Of Technology ) Dan TRA ( Theory Of Reasoned Action ),” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 118–127, 2021.