Group Decision Support System untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Sosial dengan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) dan Borda
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Indonesian government wants to offer social assistance to lessen the burden on the underprivileged. The DTKS records prospective recipients of assistance as being from low-income families (Social Welfare Integrated Data). The elimination of DTKS will take place in order to stop recipients from receiving social assistance as the recipients' standard of living rises. The standard of living of the recipients and potential beneficiaries will change at some point. Therefore, whether or not the recipients and potential beneficiaries of DTKS are eligible, it is necessary to update the DTKS. The waterfall model SDLC methodology that is being used has the requirement that each process be completed before moving on to the next one or be completed in order. In order to assess the viability of DTKS, the system can use the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and Borda methods based on the decision maker, criteria, and sub-criteria. Only RT users whose feasibility reference is above 0.29 are considered eligible according to the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method's feasibility results. The results from the Borda method with the feasibility reference were given the highest priority and the lowest weight, respectively, for the final results on feasibility after going through the AHP process
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[2] U. Habibah and M. Rosyda, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa di Pekandangan Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS,” Jurnal Transformtika, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 200–208, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i1.3471.
[3] E. Satriani, Ilhamsyah, and R. Puspita Sari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Penerima Zakat Program Pendidikan Dengan Metode Saw Dan Borda,” Jurnal Komputer dan Aplikasi, vol. 07, no. 02, pp. 71–81, 2019.
[4] R. R. Syams and A. A. Soebroto, “Sistem Rekomendasi Wisata Di Kota Batu Dengan Metode Voting Borda Berdasarkan Metode TOPSIS Dan PROMETHEE,” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 10207–10215, 2019.
[5] T. A. Idrus, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Nasabah dalam Memilih Produk Rahn di Pegadaian Syariah Ar Hakim Medan dengan Cabang Metode Borda,” 2018.
[6] D. N. Ilham and S. Mulyana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Pemilihan Tempat PKL mahasiswa dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP dan Borda,” IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), vol. 11, no. 1, p. 55, 2017, doi:10.22146/ijccs.16595.
[7] R. Waluyo et al., “Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Borda Untuk Seleksi Analytical Hierarchy Process and Borda Method for Selection of,” vol. 8, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202182743.
[8] M. A. Budhi and R. Wardoyo, “Group Decision Support System Determination Of Best Employee Using Topsis And Borda,” IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), vol. 11, no. 2, p. 165, 2017, doi: 10.22146/ijccs.22773.
[9] A. Aris Widodo and M. Misdram, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kenaikan Jabatan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” Jurnal Mnemonic, vol.2, no.2, pp. 18–23, 2019, doi:10.36040/mnemonic.v2i2.2259.
[10] A. R Laisouw, S. Lutfi, and F. Tempola, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan (Pkh) Pada Orang Miskin Di Kota Ternate Menggunakan Metode Ahp,” JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 34–60, 2019, doi: 10.33387/jiko.v2i1.973.
[11] I. Pratistha, I. P. Agung Mahadewa, and P. Sugiartawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Pemilihan e- commerce/marketplace menggunakan metode profile matching dan BORDA,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Komputer Terapan Indonesia (JSIKTI), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2018, doi: 10.33173/jsikti.9.
[12] M. Weighted, P. Dan, and M. Borda, “Implementasi Group Decision Support System,” pp. 601–609.
[13] A. A. Ghea and A. S. Andy, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Unit Perusahaan Menggunakan Metode Topsis Dan Borda,” Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 12, 2018.
[14] S. E. T. B. Buana, L. H. Atrinawati, and M. G. L. Putra, “Penerapan Metode Agile Untuk Membangun Sistem Informasi Monitoring Santri Pondok Modern Asy-Syifa Balikpapan,” Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi, vol. 5, pp. 183–190, 2021.
[15] M. Irawan and F. S. Amalia, “Pengembangan Sistem Pembelajaran Online Berbasis Web Menggunakan Framework Laravel,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2021.
[16] P. K. Malang, T. Informatika, and P. K. Malang, “IMPLEMENTASI FRAMEWORK LARAVEL DALAM SISTEM,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 35–42, 2019.
[17] H. Amnur, M. Ruangan Rapat, A. Absensi, and W. Manajemen Ruangan, “MRAPAT Untuk Sistem Manajemen Ruanga Rapat, Absensi, dan Notulen di PT PLN Unit Wilayah Sumbar,” 2020. [Online]. Available: http://jurnal-itsi.org
[18] A. Josi, “Penerapan Metode Prototyping Dalam Membangun Website Desa (Studi Kasus Desa Sugihan Kecamatan Rambang),” Jti, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2017.
[19] A. N. Nurhayati, A. Josi, and N. A. Hutagalung, “Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Penjualan Dan Pembelian Barang Pada Koperasi Kartika Samara Grawira Prabumulih,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Informasi, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 13–23, 2018, doi: 10.34010/jati.v7i2.490.
[20] R. Abdillah, “PEMODELAN UML UNTUK SISTEM INFORMASI PERSEWAAN ALAT PESTA,” JURNAL FASILKOM, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.37859/jf.v11i2.2673.
[21] Suendri, “Implementasi Diagram UML (Unified Modelling Language) Pada Perancangan Sistem Informasi Remunerasi Dosen Dengan Database Oracle (Studi Kasus: UIN Sumatera Utara Medan),” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika, vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.
[22] T. Pricillia and Zulfachmi, “Perbandingan Metode Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak (Waterfall, Prototype, RAD),” Jurnal Bangkit Indonesia, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2021, doi:10.52771/bangkitindonesia.v10i1.153