Analisis Hubungan Technostress Terhadap Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Pada Guru SMA

Bilah Samping Artikel

PDF
Diterbitkan: Mar 31, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62527/jitsi.6.1.399
Kata Kunci:
Technostress, Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi, Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling, HAIS-Q

Isi Artikel Utama

Airlangga Bayu
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Bambang Setiawan
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Abstrak

Technostress merupakan suatu fenomena yang akhir-akhir ini sering terjadi karena berkembangnya teknologi informasi yang signifikan. Pasca pandemi COVID 19, banyak sektor telah bertransformasi ke teknologi informasi. Akibatnya banyak individu yang merasa belum sepenuhnya siap untuk menggunakan teknologi merasa terebani sehingga rentan mengalami technostress. Disisi lain, semakin berkembangnya teknologi informasi, maka risiko kesadaran keamanan informasi juga semakin rentan. Hal ini dapat dibuktikan dengan semakin maraknya kasus-kasus kebocoran data yang terjadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan dan pengaruh antara technostress terhadap kesadaran keamanan informasi. Penelitian ini mengadaptasi tiga domain dari HAIS-Q yakni pengelolaan kata sandi, penggunaan aplikasi, dan penggunaan email. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode PLS SEM dengan jumlah responden 84 orang. Hasil dari penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa technostress terikait pengelolaan kata sandi dan technostress terkait penggunaan email berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kesadaran keamanan informasi. Sedangkan technostress terkait penggunaan aplikasi berpengaruh negatif namun tidak signifikan terhadap kesadaran keamanan informasi.

Rincian Artikel

##submission.howToCite##
Bayu, A., & Setiawan, B. (2025). Analisis Hubungan Technostress Terhadap Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Pada Guru SMA. JITSI : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 77 - 85. https://doi.org/10.62527/jitsi.6.1.399
Terbitan
Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Bagian
Articles
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##

Referensi

[1] H. Özgür, “Relationships between teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), school support and demographic variables: A structural equation modeling,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 112, no. March, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106468.
[2] L. Li, “Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education,” Cogn. Technol. Work, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 315–330, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0.
[3] Z. N. Khlaif, “Correction to: Impact of Technostress on Continuance Intentions to Use Mobile Technology (The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, (2022), 10.1007/s40299-021-00638-x),” Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 32, no. 2. p. 163, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s40299-022-00646-5.
[4] I. Hwang and O. Cha, “Examining technostress creators and role stress as potential threats to employees’ information security compliance,” Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563217307033?casa_token=nAF1S67Swn0AAAAA:3nrbMQgoP7abi8kj7eQab-s_Aqb9WZQMjfyDhT1jcapP1gp1DqU2TETmkvBTGebtd2PqHq1I
[5] M. E. Bahamondes-Rosado, L. M. Cerdá-Suárez, and ..., “Technostress at work during the COVID-19 lockdown phase (2020–2021): a systematic review of the literature,” Frontiers in …. frontiersin.org, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173425.
[6] C. Conrad, Q. Deng, I. Caron, O. Shkurska, P. Skerrett, and B. Sundararajan, “How student perceptions about online learning difficulty influenced their satisfaction during Canada’s Covid-19 response,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 534–557, 2022, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13206.
[7] Z. Wang, L. Zhang, X. Wang, L. Liu, and C. Lv, “Navigating Technostress in primary schools: a study on teacher experiences, school support, and health,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, no. November, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1267767.
[8] M. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and T. S. Ragu-Nathan, “The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 301–328, 2007, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109.
[9] K. Wang, Q. Shu, and Q. Tu, “Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 3002–3013, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007.
[10] F. K. Mupila, H. Gupta, A. University, and A. Bhardwaj, “An Empirical Study on Cyber Crimes and Cybersecurity Awareness,” pp. 1–24, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3037289/v1
[11] G. Sarkar and S. K. Shukla, “Behavioral analysis of cybercrime: Paving the way for effective policing strategies,” J. Econ. Criminol., vol. 2, no. October, p. 100034, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100034.
[12] T. N. Nguyen, H. Chi, M. City, and V. Correspondence, “A review of cyber crime,” J. Soc. Rev. Dev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2023, [Online]. Available: www.dzarc.com/social
[13] M. Zwilling, G. Klien, D. Lesjak, Ł. Wiechetek, F. Cetin, and H. N. Basim, “Cyber Security Awareness, Knowledge and Behavior: A Comparative Study,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 82–97, 2022, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2020.1712269.
[14] A. Kovacevic, N. Putnik, and O. Toskovic, “Factors Related to Cyber Security Behavior,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 125140–125148, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007867.
[15] D. R. Rahadi, PENGANTAR PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (PLS-SEM) 2023, Cetakan Pe. Tasikmalaya: LENTERA ILMU MADANI, 2023.