Pemilihan Peserta Terbaik pada Sistem Manajemen Bimbingan Belajar Uji Kompetensi dengan Metode Weighted Product dan Simple Additive Weighting

Main Article Content

Firman Shiddiq Alamsyah
Deni Satria
Yulherniwati

Abstract

The Competency Test Learning Guidance is a platform for students or nurses who wish to enter the workforce. The learning guidance organized by Appskep Indonesia is held annually in several periods. One of the efforts to improve the quality of the participants is by evaluating them and selecting the best participants for each class period in Appskep Indonesia. The selection of the best participants in the Competency Test Learning Guidance at Appskep Indonesia currently lacks a system capable of conducting effective and efficient evaluations. The criteria for selecting the best participants in the Competency Test Learning Guidance at Appskep include the average exam scores from the Competency Test tryouts taken by the participants, access to materials available to all registered participants, attendance at the start and end of the classes, and each participant's level of activeness. The decision support system for selecting the best participants for this research uses the Weighted Product (WP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods, implemented in a website. SAW is a method that involves finding the weighted sum of performance ratings for each alternative across all attributes. In contrast, WP uses multiplication to relate attribute ratings, where each attribute is first raised to the power of its respective weight. The research was conducted to test three class periods starting from July 2023 to March 2024. The study compared the results of the methods in Excel and on the website, achieving 100% accuracy. This research compares the SAW and WP methods for the intensive batch 158, intensive batch 157, and intensive batch 156 class periods. The results for the intensive batch 158 showed that the best participant was Aditya Rizal with WP and SAW scores of 0.01207 and 1.01, respectively. For the intensive batch 157, the best participant was Sarri Qurrotul with WP and SAW scores of 0.01099 and 0.95, respectively. For the intensive batch 156, the best participant was Ari Lani with WP and SAW scores of 0.01707 and 1.01, respectively

Article Details

How to Cite
Alamsyah, F. S., Satria, D., & Yulherniwati. (2026). Pemilihan Peserta Terbaik pada Sistem Manajemen Bimbingan Belajar Uji Kompetensi dengan Metode Weighted Product dan Simple Additive Weighting. JITSI : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 7(1), 62 - 69. https://doi.org/10.62527/jitsi.7.1.555
Section
Articles

References

D. N. Damanik and M. Hastuti, “Tingkat Kecemasan Mahasiswa Tingkat Iii Keperawatan Yang Akan Mengikuti Uji Kompetensi Diploma III Keperawatan.” Excellent Midwifery Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp 8-15, 2019.
[2] A. Y. Pratama and S. Yunita, “Komparasi Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Pemberian Beasiswa.” Jurnal Sistem Komputer dan Informatika (JSON), vol. 4, no. 1, 2022.
[3] M. Muslihudin, and D. Rahayu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product.” Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), vol. 8, no. 2, pp 114-119, 2018.
[4] A. Aulia, D. Supriyadi, and R. Ramadhani, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Dan Weighted Product (Wp) Dalam Pemilihan Guru Teladan (Studi Kasus: MI Ma’arif NU 1 Ajibarang Wetan).” Proceeding SENDI_U, 2018.
[5] H. Murtina, N. Hidayatun, and Susafa’ati, “Implementasi Multi Attribute Decision Making Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product Dalam Pemilihan Supervisor.” Jurnal Teknoinfo, vol. 16, no. 2, pp 435-442, 2022.
[6] Kanim, Tukiyat, M. Handayani, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution, Simple Additive Weighting dan Weighted Product dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik” Jurnal Sistem Informasi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33-40, 2023.
[7] N. Arifianti and A. F. Rozi, “Sistem Penilaian Guru Teladan Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) dan Weighted Product (WP)” Jurnal Multimedia dan Artificial intelligence, vol. 1, no. 2, pp 10-16, 2017.
[8] N. A. Dahana “Perbandingan Metode Weighted Product (WP) dan SimpleAdditive Weighting (SAW) terhadap Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Calon Paskibraka” Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi), vol. 5, no. 3, pp 227-237, 2021.
[9] R. Setiawati, M. A. Triayudi, and I. D. Sholihati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Pengadaan Barang Menggunakan Metode Saw Dan Wp (Studi Kasus Rumah Sakit Jiwa Grhasia Yogyakarta)” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018.
[10] Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi Wilayah VIII. (n.d.). Uji Kompetensi Nasional. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. Diakses pada 1 Juni 2024 dari https://lldikti8.kemdikbud.go.id/ukom/
[11] Diana, Metode dan Aplikasi Sistem Pedukung Keputusan, Edisi Pertama, Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.
[12] M. Solahudin, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Akademik Sekolah (SIAS) Berbasis Website.” Journal of Computer and Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp 107-113, 2021.
[13] Abdulloh and Rohit, “Membuat Toko Online dengan Teknik OOP, MVC, dan AJAX” Jakarta : PT Elex Media Komputindo, 2017.
[14] M. Muslihudin, Fauzi, S. Abadi, Trinasti, and S. Mukodimah, “Implementasi Konsep Decision Support System dan Fuzzy Multiple Atribute Decision Making (FMADM)”, Edisi Pertama, Indramayu: Penerbit Adab, 2021. (14)
[15] F.Basyaib, Teori Pembuatan Keputusan, Jakarta: Grasindo, 2006.
[16] Ahmadi, A., & Wiyanti, D. T. “Implementasi Weighted Product (WP) dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Langsung Masyarakat PNPM Mandiri Perdesaan” Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI), 2014.
[17] Hidra Amnur, D. Indah Syafira, and Yulherniwati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan PKH Menggunakan Metode AHP-ARAS”, jitsi, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 180 - 188, Dec. 2023.
[18] H.Wadi, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode Simple Additve Weighting dengan Python GUI & MySQL, Studi Kasus : Penentuan Prioritas Penerima Beasiswa, Jakarta: Turida Publisher, 2024.
[19] Anhar, Panduan Menguasai PHP & MySQL Secara Otodidak. Jakarta Selatan : MediaKita, 2010.
[20] https://www.it-jurnal.com/tipe-data-pada-database-sql/ diakses tanggal 24 Juli 2024.
[21] M. Sri, Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Keuangan Daerah: Notasi Pemodelan Unified Modeling Language (UML). Bandung : Abdi Sistematika, 2017.
[22] A.S., Rosa & Shalahuddin, M. Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Terstruktur dan Berorientasi Objek. Bandung: Informatika Bandung, 2016.
[23] Marimin, T. Hendri, and P. Haryo, Sistem informasi manajemen : manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta : PT Grasindo, 2006.
[24] S. Untung, Pemodelan Perangkat Lunak SMK/MAK Kelas XI, Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana indonesia, 2021.
[25] E. Fernando, dkk, “Desain Sistem Pengenalan Varietas Bibit Tanaman Kelapa Sawit Dengan Pendekatan Design Science Research Methodology (Dsrm)” Journal of Computer and Information Technology, vol.7, no.2, pp 249-256, 2020