A Researcher’s Journey from Traditional Qualitative Methods to Tech-Driven Insights

Main Article Content

Lee Khuan
Nurul Akma Jamil
Siti Mariam Muda

Abstract

The integration of technology into qualitative research has revolutionised traditional methods, providing researchers with new opportunities and challenges. This paper compares the effectiveness, strengths, and limitations of traditional versus technology-based methods for recruiting participants, conducting interviews, and transcribing data, based on the personal experiences of the researchers. The findings reveal that while traditional face-to-face interviews enable deeper personal interaction and richer data collection, they are often time-consuming and logistically challenging. In contrast, technology-based methods offer increased accessibility, efficiency, and flexibility, particularly when recruiting participants and conducting interviews among geographically dispersed populations. However, these methods may compromise the depth of data due to the challenges of maintaining non-verbal cues and transcription accuracy, particularly when using automated transcription tools. This paper recommends a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both methods. Best practices for using technology in qualitative research are proposed to ensure the richness and contextual depth of the data while leveraging the benefits of modern tools.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khuan, L., Jamil, N. A., & Muda, S. M. (2024). A Researcher’s Journey from Traditional Qualitative Methods to Tech-Driven Insights. JITSI : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 5(4), 193 - 198. https://doi.org/10.62527/jitsi.5.4.301
Section
Articles

References

[1] Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE
[2] Redlich-Amirav, D., & Higginbottom, G. (2014). New emerging technologies in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1212
[3] Chia, C. K., Ghavifekr, S., & Razak, A. Z. A. (2020). Online interview tools for qualitative data collection during Covid-19 pandemic; Review of web conferencing platforms’ functionality. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 95-106.
[4] Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with Generations X and Y in Generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218-229.. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218
[5] Teo, A. R., Liebow, S. B., Chan, B., Dobscha, S. K., & Graham, A. L. (2018). Reaching those at risk for psychiatric disorders and suicidal ideation: Facebook advertisements to recruit military veterans. JMIR mental health, 5(3), e10078
[6] Franz, D., Marsh, H. E., Chen, J. I., & Teo, A. R. (2019). Using Facebook for qualitative research: a brief primer. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(8), e13544.
[7] Saarijärvi, M., & Bratt, E. L. (2021). When face-to-face interviews are not possible: Tips and tricks for video, telephone, online chat, and email interviews in qualitative research. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(4), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab038
[8] Dubé, M. O., Meziane, R. S., Hudon, A., Cavallo, S., Verduyckt, I., & Zidarov, D. (2023). Virtual synchronous qualitative data collection methods used in health and social sciences: A scoping review of benefits, challenges and practical insights. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231214679.
[9] Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1609406915621420
[10] Liamputtong P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London, England: SAGE.
[11] McCloskey, R. J., & Karandikar, S. (2018). A liberation health approach to examining challenges and facilitators of peer-to-peer human milk sharing. Journal of Human Lactation, 34(3), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334418771301
[12] Perrin, M. T., Goodell, L. S., Fogleman, A., Pettus, H., Bodenheimer, A. L., & Palmquist, A. E. (2016). Expanding the Supply of Pasteurized Donor Milk: Understanding Why Peer-to-Peer Milk Sharers in the United States Do Not Donate to Milk Banks. Journal of human lactation: Official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 32(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334415627024
[13] Reyes-Foster, B. M., Carter, S. K., & Hinojosa, M. S. (2015). Milk sharing in practice: A descriptive analysis of peer breastmilk sharing. Breastfeeding Medicine, 10(5), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2015.0009
[14] Jenkins, N., Monaghan, K., & Smith, M. (2021). Did they really say that? An agential realist approach to using computer assisted transcription software in qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1965037
[15] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
[16] Moore, R. J. (2015). Automated Transcription and Conversation Analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058600